Enclosure No. 2.
5
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S CHAMBERS,
Hong Kong 23rd October,・ 193 1.
REPORT ON ORDINANCE No
32
of 193
1.
1.
I have examined the accompanying Ordinance.
intituled an
Ordinance to amend the Code of Civil Procedure, and I am
of opinion that the Ordinance is one which is not contrary to
f
the Governor s instructions.
2.
Under section 439 of the principal Ordinance, when a
judgment debtor is committed to prison in execution of
judgment, the Court fixes whatever monthly allowance it may
think sufficient for his subsistence, not exceeding twenty-
five cents per diem, which is to be paid by the person at
whose instance the judgment has been executed to the
Superintendent of Prisons by monthly payments in advance.
This maximum was the rate fixed by section 79 of the
Hong Kong Code of Civil Procedure (Ordinance No. 13 of 1873)
which has been replaced by the present Code of Civil Procedure
(Ordinance No.3 of 1901). The maximum is insufficient to
meet the cost of maintenance; the average cost per prisoner
in 1930 having being in excess of $1.25 per diem. In 1931
it is expected to cost more. This Ordinance raises the
maximum to $2.00 and substitutes the words "support and
Page
age 6
6
END
maintenance", which in relation to prisoners have been
held to include the salaries of officers and the
expense of keeping up the prison as well as houseroom,
food, clothing, bedding and fuel (The queen v. Gravesend
Borough Council 5 E. and B. 459), for the word
"subsistence" which does not appear to have been the
subject of judicial interpretation.
3.
In my opinion this is an Ordinance to which His
Excellency the Governor may properly as sent in the name
of His Majesty and on His behalf.
eqalabant
Attorney General.
Page
age 6
82746
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.